HP Dismisses Malicious Printer Hijack Hack
Firmware print job redirection hack publicly demonstrated by a Columbia University team disputed by HP
Columbia University researchers demonstrated a bug in common office printers that could be used to forward documents to a remote computer or to remotely send commands that heat up and physically damage the printers, according to a MSNBC.com report. HP immediately issued a statement admitting the vulnerability’s existence in “some” LaserJet printers but denying the scope of the claims.
Professor Salvatore Stolfo and researcher Ang Cui of Columbia University’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences showed how a remote machine could scan a document, using a tax form as his example, and post sensitive data on Twitter.
Poisoned document source
Malicious perpetrators can compromise a printer just by tricking a user into printing a booby-trapped document, according to Cui (pictured)and Stolfo. There is also another way, in which printers configured to print jobs over the Internet can be remotely updated with malicious firmware without the printer owner’s knowledge or awareness, the researchers said.
HP’s rebuttal statement stressed, “While HP has identified a potential security vulnerability with some HP LaserJet printers, no customer has reported unauthorised access. The specific vulnerability exists for some HP LaserJet devices if placed on a public internet without a firewall. In a private network, some printers may be vulnerable if a malicious effort is made to modify the firmware of the device by a trusted party on the network. In some Linux or Mac environments, it may be possible for a specially formatted corrupt print job to trigger a firmware upgrade.”
Sophistication brings vulnerability
The idea that printers cannot be compromised “is nothing new”, Jonathan Gossels, CEO and president of IT compliance and security consulting firm SystemExperts, told eWEEK. Modern printers have always been vulnerable to attack because they are “sophisticated computers in their own right”, he said.
Detecting the malicious firmware would be nearly impossible, according to Cui, since no modern security tool has the ability to scan or repair software running on embedded systems such as printers.