<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greenpeace Admits Using &#8216;Dirty&#8217; Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/greenpeace-admits-using-coal-and-nuclear-power-for-hosting-op-5667/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/greenpeace-admits-using-coal-and-nuclear-power-for-hosting-op-5667</link>
	<description>Enhancing business with technology - in association with eweek.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:58:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: data center planning</title>
		<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/greenpeace-admits-using-coal-and-nuclear-power-for-hosting-op-5667#comment-40282</link>
		<dc:creator>data center planning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 06:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/?p=5667#comment-40282</guid>
		<description>Great stuff, Just forwarded this on to a coworker who read up on this and she took me to eat after I showed her this site.  So, appreciate it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff, Just forwarded this on to a coworker who read up on this and she took me to eat after I showed her this site.  So, appreciate it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: data center</title>
		<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/greenpeace-admits-using-coal-and-nuclear-power-for-hosting-op-5667#comment-25716</link>
		<dc:creator>data center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/?p=5667#comment-25716</guid>
		<description>Yet another awesome post, always great to read your website!  Keep at it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another awesome post, always great to read your website!  Keep at it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/greenpeace-admits-using-coal-and-nuclear-power-for-hosting-op-5667#comment-4453</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/?p=5667#comment-4453</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Greenpeace on many things, but this criticism  is silly. 

RECs represent the delivery of renewable energy to the grid. They are recommended as a way for people and organizations to balance out the emissions generated from their electricity use by the Union of Concerned Scientists, EDF and National Resources Defense Council. 

Read more here:
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/what_you_can_do/buy-green-power.html

You might consider me biased (I work for a company in the REC market) but I think RECs are an excellent way for organizations to lower their environmental impact and accelerate the development of a renewable energy economy.  Greenpeace should be proud that their data centers use them, and has nothing to apologize for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Greenpeace on many things, but this criticism  is silly. </p>
<p>RECs represent the delivery of renewable energy to the grid. They are recommended as a way for people and organizations to balance out the emissions generated from their electricity use by the Union of Concerned Scientists, EDF and National Resources Defense Council. </p>
<p>Read more here:<br />
<a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/what_you_can_do/buy-green-power.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/what_you_can_do/buy-green-power.html</a></p>
<p>You might consider me biased (I work for a company in the REC market) but I think RECs are an excellent way for organizations to lower their environmental impact and accelerate the development of a renewable energy economy.  Greenpeace should be proud that their data centers use them, and has nothing to apologize for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mekhong Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/greenpeace-admits-using-coal-and-nuclear-power-for-hosting-op-5667#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>Mekhong Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/?p=5667#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m often uncomfortable with Greenpeace&#039;s militancy -- which is the major reason I&#039;ve never joined -- I will defend them, to a degree, in this instance.

If it is important for Greenpeace to have a physical presence in a given location, they will need utilities. If those utilities (not just electricity, but water as well, which may come from dams and the like) involve the use of &quot;dirty power,&quot; then the decision-makers in Greenpeace are going to have to decide which trumps in that particular case: the need to be present, or standing by clean power -- even if it means passing up a chance to establish a physical presence?

Sometimes they&#039;ll decide the need for a presence overrides the fact that their presence will be powered by dirty power. And sometimes people will agree with them.

Even saints use sinners to get a job done. (Not that anyone at Greenpeace is a *saint,* mind you!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m often uncomfortable with Greenpeace&#8217;s militancy &#8212; which is the major reason I&#8217;ve never joined &#8212; I will defend them, to a degree, in this instance.</p>
<p>If it is important for Greenpeace to have a physical presence in a given location, they will need utilities. If those utilities (not just electricity, but water as well, which may come from dams and the like) involve the use of &#8220;dirty power,&#8221; then the decision-makers in Greenpeace are going to have to decide which trumps in that particular case: the need to be present, or standing by clean power &#8212; even if it means passing up a chance to establish a physical presence?</p>
<p>Sometimes they&#8217;ll decide the need for a presence overrides the fact that their presence will be powered by dirty power. And sometimes people will agree with them.</p>
<p>Even saints use sinners to get a job done. (Not that anyone at Greenpeace is a *saint,* mind you!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pagunsan</title>
		<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/greenpeace-admits-using-coal-and-nuclear-power-for-hosting-op-5667#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pagunsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/?p=5667#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Oh my goodness -_- how can they be advocates of living green when they themselves aren&#039;t green =( tsk tsk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my goodness -_- how can they be advocates of living green when they themselves aren&#8217;t green =( tsk tsk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using xcache
Database Caching 12/18 queries in 0.004 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 439/442 objects using xcache

Served from: www.techweekeurope.co.uk @ 2012-05-24 10:39:34 -->
