secure smartphone chain lock unlock

Infosec: BYOD Does Not Save Money, Warns Blackpool Council

Council IT boss declares BYOD more expensive than using inhouse kit

On by Tom Jowitt 0

The fledgling optimism surrounding the bring your own device (BYOD) trend could be derailed after the head of IT at a local council warned it does not save money, and indeed costs more than if the council were to invest in its own mobile phones.

This damming assessment came from Blackpool Council’s head of ICT services, Tony Doyle, speaking at the InfoSec conference in London this week.

More Expensive

According to the Guardian, Doyle told delegates that rolling out Blackpool’s BYOD policy is costing more than it would to provide the mobiles itself and he warned that any Councils thinking of implementing their own BYOD scheme, should not think of them as a money-saving exercise. Earlier this month, Leeds City Council announced that it had opened its corporate doors to the BYOD trend and was starting to allow workers to use their own personal devices.

Blackpool Council meanwhile has reportedly realised that since beginning its own BYOD scheme, it actually costs more to allow staff to use their own devices than corporate ones, after additional requirements such as mobile device management and help-desk support are factored in.

Some Positives

“I don’t believe the right reason to introduce a BYOD policy is to make cost savings. My sense at the moment is that it’s costing us more because of the extra burden on the helpdesk, and the cost of software to manage the devices,” Doyle was quoted as saying.

“I also think you’ve got to factor in that if it all goes wrong, the local authority may fall foul of the information commissioner for a breach and get a £500,000 fine.”

Yet despite highlighting negative, Doyle was also keen to stress that there were some positive benefits to BYOD.

He cited benefits such as flexible working, office space rationalisation, including a reduction in the number of desks it provides, and the introduction of hotdesking. Doyle told delegates the Councils planning their own BYOD scheme should instead it as a way of supporting staff and helping to bring about job satisfaction.

According to the Guardian, Citrix is Blackpool’s supplier, and it offers both a high-security domain and low-security domain for the council’s applications. BYOD users are only able to access low security domains such as email, secure browser, and a staff telephone directory.

“We think the risks are too great [to open up access to the higher security domain],” Doyle said.

Security Worries

The BYOD trend has been consistently dogged by the concerns about the security implications of allowing staff to bring their own smartphones and laptops into corporate workplace. However gradually some businesses and organisations are beginning to realise that it does offer benefits including end user appreciation and increased productivity.

But still security concerns linger, with many still worried at the security impact of the move. In February Mobilisafe warned that small businesses are facing an increased risk from mobile devices that are now flooding into the workplace.

Are you a security guru? Test yourself with our quiz!

Tom Jowitt

Author: Tom Jowitt

Freelance TechWeek Reporter
Tom Jowitt Tom Jowitt Tom Jowitt
Techweekeurope for mobile devices
Android-App Google Currents App for iOS

Last comment




0 replies to Infosec: BYOD Does Not Save Money, Warns Blackpool Council

Leave a Reply

  • Required fields are marked *,
    Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>