<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Microsoft Can&#8217;t Afford To Let Novell Die</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/comment/why-microsoft-cant-afford-to-let-novell-die-5681/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/comment/why-microsoft-cant-afford-to-let-novell-die-5681</link>
	<description>Enhancing business with technology - in association with eweek.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: carolinason</title>
		<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/comment/why-microsoft-cant-afford-to-let-novell-die-5681#comment-3144</link>
		<dc:creator>carolinason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/?p=5681#comment-3144</guid>
		<description>why would microsoft buy novell and rebrand suse. that would be competing against themselves. no one uses netware anymore except some pharma and other hippa companies. maybe make suse crippleware, which it is close to now imho. red hat might could, but then how is that all absorbed into the company, already with a brand of their own. hhmm perhaps it should just ride itself out. suse was a great distro back in the day. some move on some don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would microsoft buy novell and rebrand suse. that would be competing against themselves. no one uses netware anymore except some pharma and other hippa companies. maybe make suse crippleware, which it is close to now imho. red hat might could, but then how is that all absorbed into the company, already with a brand of their own. hhmm perhaps it should just ride itself out. suse was a great distro back in the day. some move on some don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPS</title>
		<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/comment/why-microsoft-cant-afford-to-let-novell-die-5681#comment-3119</link>
		<dc:creator>MPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/?p=5681#comment-3119</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately Novell is not as thriving as Redhat and others, and their deal with Microsoft is due to run out. 

However that isn&#039;t the issue. This is a hostile takeover bid. It is the Novell shareholders to whom this takeover will appeal, not the Novell board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately Novell is not as thriving as Redhat and others, and their deal with Microsoft is due to run out. </p>
<p>However that isn&#8217;t the issue. This is a hostile takeover bid. It is the Novell shareholders to whom this takeover will appeal, not the Novell board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/comment/why-microsoft-cant-afford-to-let-novell-die-5681#comment-3024</link>
		<dc:creator>kaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/?p=5681#comment-3024</guid>
		<description>why the fuck would Novell be stupid enough to even Consider this!? They are thriving as a Business.... I can&#039;t see Novell Selling up and packing their bags.... They have got too much of a bright future ahead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why the fuck would Novell be stupid enough to even Consider this!? They are thriving as a Business&#8230;. I can&#8217;t see Novell Selling up and packing their bags&#8230;. They have got too much of a bright future ahead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/comment/why-microsoft-cant-afford-to-let-novell-die-5681#comment-3013</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/?p=5681#comment-3013</guid>
		<description>I agree with your conclusion. Novell had its day with suse and performed poorly. Its time to pass the ball. I would not be surprised to see suse rebranded to Microsoft Linux, GPL and all. It&#039;s time for Microsoft to make a bold move. They&#039;ve been coasting on their success for too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your conclusion. Novell had its day with suse and performed poorly. Its time to pass the ball. I would not be surprised to see suse rebranded to Microsoft Linux, GPL and all. It&#8217;s time for Microsoft to make a bold move. They&#8217;ve been coasting on their success for too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Ruane</title>
		<link>http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/comment/why-microsoft-cant-afford-to-let-novell-die-5681#comment-3011</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Ruane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/?p=5681#comment-3011</guid>
		<description>If Microsoft or IBM buy Novell then they would have an Identity Management product that actually works. Then they could get rid of ILM or TIM TAM which don&#039;t work nearly as well as Novell IDM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Microsoft or IBM buy Novell then they would have an Identity Management product that actually works. Then they could get rid of ILM or TIM TAM which don&#8217;t work nearly as well as Novell IDM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using xcache
Database Caching 11/19 queries in 0.005 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 429/434 objects using xcache

Served from: www.techweekeurope.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 18:58:01 -->
